A Meta-Analytical Study Appraising the Effectiveness and Safety of Diclofenac Sodium for Senescent Knee Arthritis Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The analysis yielded significant revelations regarding the effectiveness and safety of utilizing diclofenac sodium as a treatment choice for knee osteoarthritis in the elderly population. The keywords "diclofenac sodium" and "knee osteoarthritis" were used to search the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases, while the terms "diclofenac" and "knee osteoarthritis" were employed to search Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library and PubMed. Two assessors independently evaluated the quality of the included articles using the Cochrane scoring system. Extraction of data from the selected studies was performed, and the effect of diclofenac sodium was quantified through meta-analysis with RevMan 5.3. Following the process of literature search, selection, and quality assessment, a total of 8 studies were identified as suitable for incorporation in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results indicated that participants in the diclofenac sodium experimental group experienced significant enhancements in Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index pain, physical function, and stiffness scores, surpassing those of the control group. Furthermore, the experimental group displayed a superior treatment efficacy. According to the meta-analysis results, the diclofenac sodium experimental group demonstrated a higher occurrence of gastrointestinal adverse events than the control group. In opposition, no significant discrepancy was detected in the occurrence of skin and other adverse events between the two groups. This meta-analysis conclusively established that diclofenac sodium exerts statistically significant effects on pain, physical function, and stiffness improvement in elderly patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. Taking into account the results of this meta-analysis and systematic review, diclofenac sodium can be recommended as a primary non-surgical treatment option for knee osteoarthritis in elderly individuals. Nonetheless, healthcare professionals should closely monitor and manage the occurrence of gastrointestinal adverse events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.049 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".