On reproduction in the Pacific boreal limpet <i>Erginus</i> (<i>Problacmaea</i>) <i>puniceus</i> Lindberg, 1988 (Patellogastropoda: Rhodopetalidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Fifty years ago, it was reported that individuals of the Pacific boreal limpet Problacmaea (= Erginus) bear a penis for copulation and brood their young in the pallial cavity. These observations were based on light microscopy, but now we reveal new details of the reproductive biology of Erginus (Problacmaea) puniceus with electron microscopy. Gametogenesis is fundamentally similar to other Patellogastropoda, but there are some key differences. Oocytes develop in the ovary, dorsal to the foot in the posterior half of the body, before passing through the oviduct to the pallial cavity, where they are fertilized and brooded. Development is direct with embryos being brooded to the crawl-away juvenile stage. However, sometimes fertilization occurs internally with embryos beginning development in or near the gonad. Free sperm, which were likely autosperm (self) but could have been allosperm (cross), were found near developing oocytes in the gonad. Spermiogenesis results in the formation of an enta-quasperm with a cap-like acrosome, a bullet-shaped nucleus and spherical mitochondria in the midpiece. Copulation was not observed, but we confirm the presence of a penis with a dorsal penial groove that lies below the right cephalic tentacle in males, which is typical of functional penises of some molluscs. Males were always smaller, but intermediate-sized individuals were hermaphroditic to different extents. The largest individuals were entirely female, and their penises were smaller and often lacked the penial groove. Thus, E. (Problacmaea) puniceus appears to be a protandrous hermaphrodite, passing from male to female phase. Remnants of the testis persist into the female phase, suggesting that they are protandrous hermaphrodites with overlap, possibly allowing for self-fertilization to occur on occasion. However, the largest females lacked any testis remnants, suggesting instead that the species may be protandrous sequential hermaphrodites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".