MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Role of thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: Results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

2024· article· en· W4391301910 on OpenAlexaff
Luca Antonelli, Pedro David Wendel‐Garcia, Manja Deforth, Luca Afferi, Marco Borghesi, Alessandro Antonelli, Karl H. Tully, Andrea Mari, Renate Pichler, Francesco Claps, Jeremy Yuen‐Chun Teoh, Gerald Bastian Schulz, Francesco Soria, Majed Alrumayyan, Michael Rink, Stefania Zamboni, Luke T. Lavallée, Marco Moschini, Ulrike Held, Christian D. Fankhauser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOttawa HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystectomyBladder cancerChemotherapyRetrospective cohort studyOncologyUrothelial cancerCancerCohortMulticenter studyUrologyInternal medicineSurgeryRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

598 Background: Patients undergoing radical cystectomy are at risk of developing venous thromboembolic events (VTE), with most VTEs occurring during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update recommends thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients with a high risk of VTE and a low risk of bleeding. However, the risks of VTE and bleeding with or without thromboprophylaxis in bladder cancer patients scheduled for radical cystectomy have not been well evaluated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with non-metastatic bladder cancer undergoing cystectomy across 28 centers in 13 countries between 1990 and 2021. Inverse probability weighting analyses were performed to estimate the effect of thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on VTE and bleeding. Results: Of 4886 patients, 4631 (95%) received neither thromboprophylaxis nor anticoagulation during chemotherapy. Thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed in 151 (3%) patients mainly being enoxaparin (80%) with a median duration of 94 (range 38 to 104) days. In inverse probability weighting analyses, patients with thromboprophylaxis compared to patients without thromboprophylaxis during chemotherapy had not only a lower VTE (HR 0.32 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.81], p-value = 0.016) but also a lower bleeding risk (HR 0.03 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.12], p-value: <0.0001). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, the benefit of thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy is in line with data from randomized trials in other malignancies. Our data suggests thromboprophylaxis seems protective against VTEs during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer patients planned for cystectomy. The ASCO guidelines recommending thromboprophylaxis during chemotherapy should therefore also be regarded as a standard of care in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→