MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Baseline disease characteristics of participants enrolled on ENZARAD (ANZUP1303) and DASL-HiCaP (ANZUP1801) trials of highly effective androgen receptor antagonists in high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa).

2024· article· en· W4391302427 on OpenAlexaff
Tamim Niazi, Paul L. Nguyen, Scott Williams, Martin R. Stockler, Andrew Martin, Lisa G. Horvath, Hayley Thomas, Danka Sinikovic Zebic, Felicia Roncolato, Tee Lim, Chakiath Jose, Jarad Martin, Hans T. Chung, Annie Ébacher, Scott C. Morgan, Simon Hughes, Sean M. McBride, Paul Kelly, Ian D. Davis, Christopher J. Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerAndrogen receptorOncologyInternal medicineCancerDiseaseProstateAndrogenHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

328 Background: ENZARAD investigates the addition of enzalutamide or conventional nonsteroidal anti-androgens (NSAA) to radiation therapy (RT) and ADT for high-risk localized PCa. DASL-HiCaP investigates the addition of darolutamide or placebo to RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) using Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog (LHRHA) for very-high-risk localized PCa as either primary definitive therapy, or as early salvage treatment after prostatectomy where PSA has persisted or become detectable within 12 months. Methods: The eligibility of DASL-HiCaP differed from ENZARAD by excluding patients solely based on PSA > 20ng/mL and also allowing a very-high risk patient population suitable for salvage radiation post prostatectomy. Participants in DASL-HiCaP were randomized 1:1 to darolutamide 600mg twice daily or placebo plus LHRHA for 96 weeks; all received external beam radiotherapy including mandated pelvic radiation. Participants in ENZARAD were randomized 1:1 to enzalutamide 160mg daily for 24 months or conventional NSAA for 6 months, plus LHRHA for 24 months, and EBRT. Brachytherapy boost was allowed in both trials and pelvic nodal radiation was at investigator’s discretion in ENZARAD. The primary end point for both trials is metastasis-free survival (MFS) (time from randomization to first evidence of metastasis or death from any cause). MFS events are based on conventional imaging with 99mTc bone scan and CT, and/or MRI. Lesions evident only on PSMA PET are not counted as MFS events. Results: The median age for both trials was 71-years. Complete baseline characteristics are summarised in the Table. ENZARAD randomized 802 participants across 8 countries. Half had Gleason score 9 (52%), 45% had cT3 PCa, 42% had cT2, and 11% were cN1. Gleason score 7 was present in up to 11% of ENZARAD population. DASL-HiCaP randomized 1,107 participants across 6 countries. Most had Gleason score 9 (69%), 41% had cT3 PCa, 32% had cT2, and 28% were cN1. Gleason score 7 was present in <5% of the DASL-HiCaP population. Conclusions: ENZARAD and DASL-HiCaP will define the efficacy of more potent hormonal therapy in the adjuvant setting of patients with both high- and very-high-risk disease and in both primary and salvage radiation settings. Clinical trial information: NCT02446444 and NCT04136353 . [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→