Differential treatment effect on overall survival (OS) based on early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): A secondary analysis of TITAN trial.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
126 Background: Early PSA response has been found to be associated with improved outcome in mHSPC patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). However, it is unknown if the treatment effect on OS varies based on early PSA response in these patients. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of TITAN study in which men with mHSPC were randomly assigned to ADT plus placebo vs. ADT plus apalutamide (ADT+APA). To compare the association of OS with early PSA response, defined as achieving a PSA nadir of ≤0.2 ng/mL at ≤6 months of randomization, between two arms, we applied multivariable Cox regression model on a landmark population with an interaction term between the treatment arm and PSA response. Adjusted OS were calculated. Confounders were chosen based on their association with PSA response and OS. Results: Overall, 1049 patients were eligible with 526 in the ADT arm and 523 in the ADT+APA arm. Approximately 24% (125/526) patients in the ADT arm and 62% (323/523) patients in the ADT+APA arm achieved early PSA nadir. On landmark analysis, ADT+APA was associated with improved OS among those with an early PSA nadir (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-1.00) but no improvement in OS among those without an early PSA nadir (HR: 1.15 [0.87-1.46]) with differential treatment effect between groups stratified by early PSA nadir by 6 months (p=0.03). Adjusted 4-year OS for patients who reached PSA nadir was 66% (95% CI: 56-75) in the ADT alone arm and 78% [74-83] in the ADT+APA arm while for patients who did not reach PSA nadir, adjusted 4-year OS was 46% [41-52] and 47% [40-54] in the ADT alone and ADT+APA arm, respectively. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) was 7.8 (95% CI: 6 to 15) for the overall landmark population, 7.7 [5 to 36] for patients with PSA nadir by 6 months, and 55 [10 to -4] for those without PSA nadir, respectively. Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis of TITAN study, early PSA nadir at or before 6 months was associated with superior OS in both treatment arms. However, there was evidence of differential treatment effect on OS based on early PSA nadir with no beneficial effect from ADT+APA in those who did not reach early PSA nadir. Patients with lack of early PSA nadir had inferior and similar OS in both treatment groups. Further investigation is needed to determine how to best manage patients treated with doublet therapy without an early PSA response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".