Analysis of Shallow Water Equation Based on Tsunami Simulations: Evidence from the Pacific Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tsunamis, particularly prevalent in the Pacific Ocean's "Ring of Fire" region, present both a scientific intrigue and a societal concern due to their potential for devastation. Central to understanding and predicting these phenomena is the Shallow Water Equations (SWEs), which describe the horizontal motion of water waves. This study delves into the specific behaviors of tsunamis in the Pacific coast, utilizing comprehensive oceanographic and seismological data from the Pacific Oceanographic Institute (POI) spanning two decades. Through the lens of the SWEs, the impacts of bathymetric features and coastal topography on tsunamis are analyzed from the perspective of propagation, wave period, and frequency. Findings highlighted the significant role of solitons or solitary waves and the destructive force they exert, especially in shallow waters. While the SWE-based models have greatly assisted in developing real-time warning systems, reducing fatalities and damages, they also present certain limitations, e.g., assuming a flat seafloor and neglecting factors such as Earth's rotation, vertical fluid motion, and real-world marine conditions like turbulence. The study underscores the need for continuous refinement of these models, emphasizing the integration of observational data with advanced computational methods to enhance tsunami prediction and preparedness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".