Dekoninck, Ralph and Aline Smeesters, eds. Le Poète face au tableau. De la Renaissance au Baroque
Bibliographic record
Abstract
by confraternity members during processions enabled women to be part of a practice that was normally performed by men.Chapter 2 focuses on how wall paintings and other artworks were experienced by members as they entered and exited the premises.Chapters 3 and 4 concentrate on specific imagery in various confraternities, and offer analyses based on their locations and usage.Chapter 5 focuses on the use of banners in public flagellant processions.Chen shows that even in public, members were meant to use specific techniques of withdrawal and spiritual vision.The second part of the book deals with the transformation and development of visual imagery and ritual practices through the centuries, especially after the Council of Trent, in various Italian cities.The book also includes an epilogue that gives an overview of how devotional ritual and Italian art were transferred via Spain to the New World.Flagellant Confraternities and Italian Art is an illustrated volume with many colour and black-and-white plates.Chen offers a detailed and complex investigation of the visual culture of flagellant confraternities based on extensive archival research.Through detailed analyses of the artwork, he shows how early flagellations brought "mind, body and spirit close to the Christ they saw in their Passion images" (29).Chen's analyses, along with the plates, make this volume a strong contribution to art and flagellation history, as well as to religious and confraternity studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".