Hornbeck II, J. Patrick. Remembering Wolsey: A History of Commemorations and Representations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
s attempt at surveying the representation and commemoration of Cardinal Wolsey, over five centuries, is unique in two manners.First, his study is comparative, examining a rich variety of sources that represented and commemorated Wolsey in several different ways.Second, he uses a chronological method, in what seems like a "long-durée" approach, to investigate some of the most influential anglophone sources-from just shortly after Wolsey's death in 1530 through the early part of the twenty-first century.In Remembering Wolsey, Hornbeck aims to show how historians and theologians over centuries have used the representation of Wolsey as a churchman and an ecclesiastical statesman, to contest the events known collectively "as the English Reformation" (4).Hornbeck further demonstrates that Wolsey's representation fits into three main prototypes as a form of analysis: Wolsey as a papist representing all that was wrong with Roman Catholicism, as an author of English schism by influencing King Henry VIII in a manner that broke England away from the Roman church, and as a "repentant sinner" (15, 50).Taking a chronological approach first, chapter 1 examines contemporary works of historians and theologians shortly after Wolsey's death in the Tudor era, overlapping with chapter 2, which analyzes parchments, pamphlets, and plays during the early Stuart period.Chapter 3 looks at texts and places of commemoration from the Restoration to Catholic emancipation.Chapter 4 focuses on three contrasting genres-historical fiction, academic history, and Civic Pageantry-followed in the next chapter by two popular examples of mass media during the twenty-first century.A selection of plates in the mid-section of the book provides a visual representation of Wolsey in art and architecture and in literary genres.If one needs to consult further sources of Wolsey's life, Hornbeck has referenced in his notes a significant number, which is outside the analysis of this text.According to Hornbeck, "the contest to shape Wolsey's" life began shortly after his death (19).One of the first and most influential contemporary sources was the biographical attempt by George Cavendish in the Metrical Visions and Life of Wolsey.Cavendish admits Wolsey's voracity for power
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".