Improving single‐stage activity recognition of excavators using knowledge distillation of temporal gradient data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-stage activity recognition methods have been gaining popularity within the construction domain. However, their low per-frame accuracy necessitates additional post-processing to link the per-frame detections. Therefore, limiting their real-time monitoring capabilities is an indispensable component of the emerging construction of digital twins. This study proposes knowledge DIstillation of temporal Gradient data for construction Entity activity Recognition (DIGER), built upon the you only watch once (YOWO) method and improving its activity recognition and localization performance. Activity recognition is improved by designing an auxiliary backbone to exploit the complementary information in the temporal gradient data (transferred into YOWO using knowledge distillation), while localization is improved primarily through integration of complete intersection over union loss. DIGER achieved a per-frame activity recognition accuracy of 93.6% and localization mean average precision at 50% of 79.8% on a large custom dataset, outperforming state-of-the-art methods without requiring additional computation during inference, making it highly effective for real-time monitoring of construction site activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it