Stratification of tumour cell radiation response and metabolic signatures visualization with Raman spectroscopy and explainable convolutional neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reprogramming of cellular metabolism is a driving factor of tumour progression and radiation therapy resistance. Identifying biochemical signatures associated with tumour radioresistance may assist with the development of targeted treatment strategies to improve clinical outcomes. Raman spectroscopy (RS) can monitor post-irradiation biomolecular changes and signatures of radiation response in tumour cells in a label-free manner. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) perform feature extraction directly from data in an end-to-end learning manner, with high classification performance. Furthermore, recently developed CNN explainability techniques help visualize the critical discriminative features captured by the model. In this work, a CNN is developed to characterize tumour response to radiotherapy based on its degree of radioresistance. The model was trained to classify Raman spectra of three human tumour cell lines as radiosensitive (LNCaP) or radioresistant (MCF7, H460) over a range of treatment doses and data collection time points. Additionally, a method based on Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to determine response-specific salient Raman peaks influencing the CNN predictions. The CNN effectively classified the cell spectra, with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score exceeding 99.8%. Grad-CAM heatmaps of H460 and MCF7 cell spectra (radioresistant) exhibited high contributions from Raman bands tentatively assigned to glycogen, amino acids, and nucleic acids. Conversely, heatmaps of LNCaP cells (radiosensitive) revealed activations at lipid and phospholipid bands. Finally, Grad-CAM variable importance scores were derived for glycogen, asparagine, and phosphatidylcholine, and we show that their trends over cell line, dose, and acquisition time agreed with previously established models. Thus, the CNN can accurately detect biomolecular differences in the Raman spectra of tumour cells of varying radiosensitivity without requiring manual feature extraction. Finally, Grad-CAM may help identify metabolic signatures associated with the observed categories, offering the potential for automated clinical tumour radiation response characterization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".