MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391329541 · doi:10.2118/217822-ms

A Comprehensive Review of Casing Deformation During Multi-Stage Hydraulic Fracturing in Unconventional Plays: Characterization, Diagnosis, Controlling Factors, Mitigation and Recovery Strategies

2024· review· en· W4391329541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingHydraulic fracturingStage (stratigraphy)Petroleum engineeringCharacterization (materials science)Deformation (meteorology)GeologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this paper is to provide a review of casing deformations that are related to the placement of Multi-Stage Hydraulic Fracturing (MSHF) in unconventional plays. This work aims to identify practical mitigation and management strategies to reduce the overall impact of such events on the economic outcome of any development. The methodology incorporates a comprehensive literature review and leverages insights from the authors’ extensive field experience. This approach aims to explore the current state of knowledge regarding casing deformations associated with MSHF in unconventional reservoirs across key global basins. This paper encompasses the identification, diagnostics, surveillance, and monitoring of such deformations as they manifest and progress, along with the implementation of mitigation and management strategies prior to and during the well-completion process. The authors recognize the disparity between the number of publications available and the actual incidence of casing deformation in specific basins and are conscious that obtaining an exact estimate may often be elusive. The technical aspects of the review rely on the examination of numerous case studies from various unconventional basins. This is achieved by establishing a comprehensive understanding of the potential causes and mechanisms of casing deformations, including their occurrence, detection, and identification. Subsequently, an analysis is performed that presents the inherent characteristics of the different types of casing deformation, encompassing their nature, severity, distribution, and frequency across the basins considered, their lateral locations, event occurrence, specific nature and other pertinent factors. Additionally, the review addresses the geological, geo-mechanical, engineering and operational control factors that are likely to contribute to such deformations. Furthermore, it identifies a range of potential mitigation strategies aimed at minimizing the occurrence and ultimately the economic effects of casing deformation occurrence. This review builds upon various ongoing industry technical initiatives undertaken by the SPE Well Integrity Technical Section - Casing Deformation Work Group. The study findings can potentially provide practical measures to manage and mitigate casing deformation in unconventional basins within horizontal wells, thus minimizing the associated economic impact. Remaining knowledge gaps that require consideration should be addressed by actively sharing best practices and case histories within the industry on a global scale. This collaborative review paper, involving operating companies and other experts, serves as an initial step in that direction, aiming to catalyse further discussion among professionals working in this sector. It is intended as a rallying cry to encourage broader participation, deeper and shared consideration of the considerable effects of casing deformation occurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it