MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391331353 · doi:10.1215/00141801-10673444

Allotment Stories: Indigenous Land Relations under Settler Siege

2023· article· en· W4391331353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Dry

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnohistory · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllotmentSiegeIndigenousGeographyHistoryArchaeologyEconomicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By shifting the focus from policy to people, Allotment Stories offers a fresh and deeply compelling retelling of the privatization of Indigenous lands. The book eschews mooring discussions of allotment in the 1887 Dawes Act in the United States. Instead, this collection of more than two dozen community-centered essays or creative contributions showcases how Indigenous people across the globe resiliently grappled with and responded to the consequences of a variety of efforts at land privatization. The book has a broad geographic and temporal scope. Many contributions focus on the continental United States and Canada, but the collection also includes essays that address Aotearoa New Zealand, Mexico, Palestine, Hawaii, Alaska, the Sápmi region of northern Europe, and Guam. Although a few take on earlier periods, most essays examine nineteenth-century, twentieth-century, or contemporary contexts. Taken together, the essays testify to diverse and dynamic Indigenous resistance, restoration, and resurgence in the face of shared experiences of land privatization.The collection is organized into four thematic sections. The first draws on the family stories of the contributors to trace the results of land privatization within families over time and includes notable contributions from the book’s editors, Daniel Heath Justice and Jean M. O’Brien. O’Brien’s essay, for example, incorporates her grandmother’s writings to show how allotment when coupled with Ojibwe traditions of mobility unexpectedly spurred the creation of new, vibrant Indigenous communities. Sections 2 and 3 examine divisive entanglements of land privatization with white supremacy, gendered ideologies, and state violence. Finally, essays in the last section more directly address themes of Indigenous resistance and resurgence that run through the whole book. The book is an admirable model of how a multidisciplinary collection can illuminate the deeply intimate and relational dimensions of a legal and administrative policy.The collection is thoughtfully situated to address the current moment. Speaking to the growing field of global Indigenous studies, the book is well suited to the classroom and includes a glossary of key terms for nonspecialists. Many authors also directly address contemporary political issues and ongoing efforts to privatize Indigenous lands, and an afterword by Stacy L. Leeds contextualizes the recent decision of the Supreme Court in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Although the essays gravitate around colonial efforts to divide and dispossess, Indigenous resiliency represents the dominant theme of this timely and enriching collection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnohistorySame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207