MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391349888 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110115

Enhancement of BER of LTE System by Using DCT-Neural Network in Different Channel Models

2024· article· en· W4391349888 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reyam Thair Ahmed, Osama Qasim Jumah Al-Thahab

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceDiscrete cosine transformElectronic engineeringComputer networkArtificial intelligenceEngineeringImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work the discrete cosine transform is proposed for LTE systems with the aid of feed-forward neural network as a suitable equalizer to retrieve the effect of channel within Rayleigh Faded channels.This system was implemented using the Quadrature-Phase Shift Keying as a modulation technique, and using different Maximum Doppler Shift, which represents the highest Doppler shift that can occur between the transmitter and the receiver in a given wireless channel.by using DCT-FFNN with different MDS values effectively mitigates signal distortion resulting from multipath propagation and common issues in wireless communication networks and demonstrates higher accuracy in predicting BER values.According to the research, the performance will be better at MDS 50 when compared to the rest of the MDS used in the paper.These advantages come with minimal loss in data rate and bandwidth and no additional expense in terms of power.The simulation results indicate that an FFNNs-based channel estimator outperforms the pilot-based channel estimator in LTE systems operating over a Rayleigh fading channel, because FFNNs have low complexity and can quickly and accurately adjust the signal strength of incoming signals based on their input.All LTE system models were implemented using MATLAB 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207