MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Classification of Lifshitz invariant in multiband superconductors: An application to Leggett modes in the linear response regime in Kagome lattice models

2024· article· en· W4391362631 on OpenAlexaff
Raigo Nagashima, Sida Tian, Rafael Haenel, Naoto Tsuji, Dirk Manske

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceJapan Science and Technology Corporation
KeywordsPhysicsSuperconductivityLattice (music)Condensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsInvariant (physics)Theoretical physicsStatistical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiband superconductors are sources of rich physics arising from multiple order parameters, which show unique collective dynamics including Leggett mode as relative phase oscillations. Previously, it has been pointed out that the Leggett mode can be optically excited in the linear response regime, as demonstrated in a one-dimensional model for multiband superconductors [T. Kamatani , ]. Here we identify the linear coupling term in the Ginzburg-Landau free energy to be the so-called Lifshitz invariant, which takes the form of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</a:mi><a:mo>·</a:mo><a:mo>(</a:mo><a:msubsup><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</a:mi><a:mi>i</a:mi><a:mo>*</a:mo></a:msubsup><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</a:mi></a:mrow><a:msub><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</a:mi><a:mi>j</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo>−</a:mo><a:msubsup><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</a:mi><a:mi>j</a:mi><a:mo>*</a:mo></a:msubsup><a:mrow><a:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</a:mi></a:mrow><a:msub><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</a:mi><a:mi>i</a:mi></a:msub><a:mo>)</a:mo></a:mrow></a:math>, where <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</i:mi></i:math> is a constant vector and <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><k:msub><k:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</k:mi><k:mi>i</k:mi></k:msub></k:math> and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:msub><m:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</m:mi><m:mi>j</m:mi></m:msub><m:mspace width="4pt"/><m:mrow><m:mo>(</m:mo><m:mi>i</m:mi><m:mo>≠</m:mo><m:mi>j</m:mi><m:mo>)</m:mo></m:mrow></m:math> represent superconducting order parameters. We classify all pairs of irreducible representations of order parameters in the crystallographic point groups that allow for the existence of the Lifshitz invariant. We emphasize that the Lifshitz invariant can appear even in systems with inversion symmetry. The results are applied to a model of <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><p:mi>s</p:mi></p:math>-wave superconductors on a Kagome lattice with various bond orders, for which in some cases we confirm that the Leggett mode appears as a resonance peak in a linear optical conductivity spectrum based on microscopic calculations. We discuss a possible experimental observation of the Leggett mode by a linear optical response in multiband superconductors. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207