MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391367514 · doi:10.31292/kadaster.v1i2.16

The Utilization of Database for Administration Purposes as a Strategy Facing the New Normal

2023· article· en· W4391367514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKadaster Journal of Land Information Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)DatabaseNew normalBusinessComputer scienceMedicinePolitical scienceLawInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rise of Industry 4.0 has revolutionized work dynamics, particularly evident in the widespread adoption of remote working practices. Employees are no longer confined to traditional office spaces; instead, they have the flexibility to work efficiently from various locations. This study delves into the creation of a remote presence application, named "The SIMPEG-Pres," within the framework of an "e-Office Application." Tailored for Ministry of Agraria and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency employees, this application incorporates remote check-in features, focusing on transparency, informativeness, and georeferenced capabilities. The e-Office application requires seamless extraction of attendance data from the services layer, manifesting as a mobile application. Employing the SIMPEG-Press application in the SIMPEG e-Office system, utilizing an Oracle database and Python backend, the research validates the "published or perished" paradigm and ensures database security. The methodology involves implementing a dummy database and categorizing employee attendance and location zones based on specific parameters, guaranteeing efficient system and user management practices. The study culminates in a comprehensive matrix outlining Land Information System (LIS) development within the BPN environment, analyzed through system development theory. Additionally, the research outlines potential opportunities and challenges in the future trajectory of LIS development, providing valuable insights for both practitioners and scholars. Keywords: Application Programming Interfaces, Location Based Services, Land Information System, Remote Presence Application, Python.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it