MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391374243 · doi:10.26812/pajls.v2i.870

The Wakan rōeishū: cannibalization or singing in harmony?

2001· article· en· W4391374243 on OpenAlexaff
Sonja Arntzen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Association for Japanese Literary Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCannibalizationSingingHarmony (color)ArtBusinessEconomicsVisual artsManagementMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Wakan roeishU (fO~AAIDl<~.ca.1012) 1 embodies a key moment in the process of assimilating Chinese poetry into the Japanese poetic tradition.It crystallized a canon of Chinese poetry specifically for Heian Japan that exerted a far reaching influence.For example, a line of Chinese poetry from the Wakan roeishU even surfaces in Kawabata Yasunari's acceptance speech for the Nobel prize in 1968.Kawabata cites the Japanese art historian •Yashiro Yukio who states that "one of the special characteristics of Japanese art can be summed up in a single poetic sentence: 'The time of the snows, of the moon, of the blossoms-then more than ever we think of our comrades."' 2This "poetic sentence" (shigo [WJ~B]) is actually an adaptation 3 of one line from a couplet by Bai Juyi (S.@~, 772-846), no.734 of the Wakan roeishu, "?JfWJ~~-Wifm:ft, ~ !H~IWJ jjiti:{!" ("Lute, poetry, wine-these friends all have abandoned me, Snow, moon, blossoms-these times, more than ever I think of you").This is the locus classicus for setsugekka, now a fixed expression in Japanese for the seasonal beauties of nature, but actually three characters from one line of one couplet from Bai Juyi's poem, "

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Association for Japanese Literary StudiesSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207