Bibliographic record
Abstract
tells us that landscapes are "constructs of the imagination projected onto wood and water and rock." 1 This is a description that can be well applied to utamakura , literally "poem-pillows," the poetic placenames that developed particular allusive associations within the densely intertextual poetics of classical waka.Akashi is one such poetic place, a site onto which various constructs have been projected, starting in the seventh century and continuing up to the present day.How, then, did Akashi, on the coast of the Inland Sea, come to be the site of one of the largest shrines to Kakinomoto no Hitomaro , the seventh-century poet canonized as a tutelary deity of Japanese poetry?The answer to this question involves religion, geography, politics, and poetry, all combining to construct the literary landscape of Akashi.There are two major features of Akashi's evolution as a poetic place.Firstly, Akashi's codification as imagined landscape had two phases: it was originally constructed in political or socio-religious terms, and then, as a direct result of that earlier construction, it came to be configured as a poetic place.Secondly, Akashi's canonization as a poetic place was very closely connected to and to a large extent dependent upon the canonization of Kakinomoto no Hitomaro as a poetic deity.The roots of Akashi's initial, political construction as landscape lie in the topographical reality of its position overlooking the straits separating Osaka Bay from the main body of the Inland Sea.This natural landmark was recast as a political boundary under the Taika Reforms and thus invested with a delineating role closely related to the issue of ken (imperial authority).In the Nihon shoki entry for the First Month of the second year of Taika ( 646), we find a definition of kinai , the area under the direct control of the tenn : "In its entirety, kinai is [the area] this side of Nabari no Yokawa to the east, this side of Senoyama in Ki to the south, this side of Kushifuchi in Akashi to the west, and this side of Sasanami no Osaka in mi to the north." 2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".