MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391374382 · doi:10.26812/pajls.v6i.1232

The Construction of Akashi as Sacred Space

2006· article· en· W4391374382 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Commons

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Association for Japanese Literary Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Architectural engineeringGeographyComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

tells us that landscapes are "constructs of the imagination projected onto wood and water and rock." 1 This is a description that can be well applied to utamakura , literally "poem-pillows," the poetic placenames that developed particular allusive associations within the densely intertextual poetics of classical waka.Akashi is one such poetic place, a site onto which various constructs have been projected, starting in the seventh century and continuing up to the present day.How, then, did Akashi, on the coast of the Inland Sea, come to be the site of one of the largest shrines to Kakinomoto no Hitomaro , the seventh-century poet canonized as a tutelary deity of Japanese poetry?The answer to this question involves religion, geography, politics, and poetry, all combining to construct the literary landscape of Akashi.There are two major features of Akashi's evolution as a poetic place.Firstly, Akashi's codification as imagined landscape had two phases: it was originally constructed in political or socio-religious terms, and then, as a direct result of that earlier construction, it came to be configured as a poetic place.Secondly, Akashi's canonization as a poetic place was very closely connected to and to a large extent dependent upon the canonization of Kakinomoto no Hitomaro as a poetic deity.The roots of Akashi's initial, political construction as landscape lie in the topographical reality of its position overlooking the straits separating Osaka Bay from the main body of the Inland Sea.This natural landmark was recast as a political boundary under the Taika Reforms and thus invested with a delineating role closely related to the issue of ken (imperial authority).In the Nihon shoki entry for the First Month of the second year of Taika ( 646), we find a definition of kinai , the area under the direct control of the tenn : "In its entirety, kinai is [the area] this side of Nabari no Yokawa to the east, this side of Senoyama in Ki to the south, this side of Kushifuchi in Akashi to the west, and this side of Sasanami no Osaka in mi to the north." 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.021
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Association for Japanese Literary StudiesSame topicJapanese History and CultureFrench-language works237,207