Decadence, double agents, and a drunken boat: colonial legacies in Tanaka Hidemitsu's Yoidorebune
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The buraiha (decadent school) is an appellation given to a group of writers who emerged in the years following Japan's unconditional surrender to the Allied Powers in 1945.While these writers did not actively identify themselves as a coherent literary circle, their writings shared an emphasis on nihilistic recklessness, dissolution, and bodily excess that was not simply a response to the chaotic conditions of immediate postwar Japan but an attempt to transcend or disrupt the prewar-postwar continuities of the authoritarian state.In 1947, for example, Tamura Taijirō (1911-1983) published an influential essay entitled "Nikutai ga ningen de aru" ("Flesh is Human"), in which he extolled the ability of the human body to resist or counteract the pernicious ideology of the state. 1 The only true things in the world, Tamura declared, were human flesh and its desires.He went on to call for a "literature of depravity" (haitai bungaku) that would "graphically depict today's realities . . . the realities of a defeated nation." 2 The 1949 long novel Yoidorebune (Drunken Boat) by Tanaka Hidemitsu (1913-1949) can be considered one example of this kind of literature.Set in colonial-period Korea and very loosely based on Tanaka's own life, Yoidorebune details the wartime activities of the writer Sakamoto Kōkichi and the alluring poet-turned-spy Ro Tenshin (Kr.Ro Ch'ŏnsim).Kōkichi has been asked to help organize a welcome reception for visiting members of the Greater East Asian Writers' Meeting (Daitōa bungakusha kaigi) being organized by the Peoples' League (Aohitokusa renmei). 3 Over the course of four days, however, the reader sees Kōkichi burn through the money given to him for the welcome reception on alcohol while wallowing in a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".