MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391374428 · doi:10.26812/pajls.v17i.1597

Decadence, double agents, and a drunken boat: colonial legacies in Tanaka Hidemitsu's Yoidorebune

2017· article· en· W4391374428 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Association for Japanese Literary Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJapanese History and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsDecadenceColonialismArtHistoryLiteratureArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The buraiha (decadent school) is an appellation given to a group of writers who emerged in the years following Japan's unconditional surrender to the Allied Powers in 1945.While these writers did not actively identify themselves as a coherent literary circle, their writings shared an emphasis on nihilistic recklessness, dissolution, and bodily excess that was not simply a response to the chaotic conditions of immediate postwar Japan but an attempt to transcend or disrupt the prewar-postwar continuities of the authoritarian state.In 1947, for example, Tamura Taijirō (1911-1983) published an influential essay entitled "Nikutai ga ningen de aru" ("Flesh is Human"), in which he extolled the ability of the human body to resist or counteract the pernicious ideology of the state. 1 The only true things in the world, Tamura declared, were human flesh and its desires.He went on to call for a "literature of depravity" (haitai bungaku) that would "graphically depict today's realities . . . the realities of a defeated nation." 2 The 1949 long novel Yoidorebune (Drunken Boat) by Tanaka Hidemitsu (1913-1949) can be considered one example of this kind of literature.Set in colonial-period Korea and very loosely based on Tanaka's own life, Yoidorebune details the wartime activities of the writer Sakamoto Kōkichi and the alluring poet-turned-spy Ro Tenshin (Kr.Ro Ch'ŏnsim).Kōkichi has been asked to help organize a welcome reception for visiting members of the Greater East Asian Writers' Meeting (Daitōa bungakusha kaigi) being organized by the Peoples' League (Aohitokusa renmei).3 Over the course of four days, however, the reader sees Kōkichi burn through the money given to him for the welcome reception on alcohol while wallowing in a Support for this research was funded by an Insight Development Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Overseas Researchers.1 Tamura Taijirō, "Nikutai ga ningen de aru" as reprinted in Nihon kindai bungaku hyōron sen: Shōwa hen ed.Chiba Shunji et al. (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2004), 365-372.Originally published in the May 1947 issue of Gunzō.As Douglas Slaymaker points out, however, Tamura "roots that freedom from the body in the (male) body" (44), making the gendered carnality of his female characters a problematic issue.See Slaymaker, The Body in Postwar Japanese Fiction (New York: Routledge, 2004), especially chapters 2 and 3.2 Tamura, "Nikutai ga ningen de aru," 370. 3 The Daitōa bungakusha kaigi is based on the Daitōa bungakusha taikai (Great East Asian Writers' Conference), a Pan-Asian conference meant to promote and fit into Japan's imperial visions of a Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.Although the conference convened for the first time in November 1942, Tanaka changes the date in Yoidorebune to September 1943.Aohitokusa renmei is a fictional organization that closely resembles the real-life Ryokki (Green Flag), a literary organization affiliated with the General-Government of Korea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Association for Japanese Literary StudiesSame topicJapanese History and CultureFrench-language works237,207