MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

12.20 Concussion in professional team sports: time for a harmonised approach?

2024· article· en· W4391384725 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandra Veuthey

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDoping in Sports
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionFootballPsychological interventionPublic relationsAthletesLegislaturePolitical scienceScope (computer science)GrassrootsBusinessPsychologyPoison controlMedicineInjury preventionPhysical therapyLawComputer scienceEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Objective</h3> Concussion in sport raises two serious concerns. First, concussion carries a public health risk, given that athletes are regularly exposed to the risk of sustaining concussion. Secondly, sports federations are exposed to the risk of financial and reputational damage as a consequence of legal proceedings being filed against them. My thesis examines how to reduce these two-fold risks, and proposes a harmonised solution across sports and legal systems. <h3>Design</h3> My thesis relies upon doctrinal research and comparative law methods. Its backbone consists of case studies, which describe and analyse the current regulation of concussion. <h3>Setting</h3> The case studies focus on selected professional team sports and countries: United States (American football, hockey, football, water polo, baseball); Canada (Canadian football); Australia (rugby, Australian Rules football); Switzerland (football, hockey); England and Brazil (football). <h3>Scope</h3> My thesis focuses on professional team sports, excluding elite and grassroots sports, as well as individual sports. <h3>Interventions/Outcome Measures</h3> The measures taken by sports federations can be divided into six categories: the rules of play, rules of the game and concussion management protocols, financial support for injured athletes, education, research and data collection. The measures taken by governments include legislative interventions and guidelines, other congressional and parliamentary interventions, education, research and data collection. <h3>Main Results</h3> While sports federations and governments have made notable regulatory efforts, opportunities for further improvement exist. Current efforts are taking place within a framework that is still too often opaque, conflictive, defensive and self-centered. Harmonised reforms appear urgently necessary, given the ongoing nature of the concussion controversy across countries and sports, and the need for sport to operate internationally. The proposed reforms, inspired by the anti-doping system, consist of an international standard, an international convention, a new international sports safety body and some limited enforcement mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDoping in SportsFrench-language works237,207