MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

4.4 Aerobic exercise for sport-related concussion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4391384832 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Langevin, Pierre Frémont, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Michaël Bertrand-Charrette, Jean‐Sébastien Roy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerobic exerciseMedicinePhysical therapyPsychological interventionMeta-analysisConcussionAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialMEDLINEPoison controlInternal medicineInjury preventionPsychiatryEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To assess the effects of symptom-limited aerobic exercise programs compared to control interventions, on symptom intensity, time to recovery, balance, cognitive capacity and adverse events in individuals with sport-related concussion (SRC). Design Systematic review with meta-analyses. Participants After scrutinized four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and EBM Reviews) with specific inclusion criteria (RCTs, SRC population [any ages], aerobic exercise as one of the interventions studied), seven RCTs (326 participants) in adolescents (no studies retrieved in adults or elderly) were included. Intervention Symptom-limited aerobic exercise programs compared to a control intervention. Outcome Measures Symptom intensity (post-concussion symptoms scale or inventory), time to recovery, balance, cognitive capacity and adverse events. Main Results Three out of seven RCTs had a high risk of bias according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Symptom-limited aerobic exercise interventions have a significant beneficial effect on perception of symptoms (6 studies, 277 participants, low quality evidence according to GRADE recommendations, pooled SMD 95%CI: -0.44 [-0.68, -0.19]). When introduced in the acute phase, a symptom-limited aerobic exercise intervention has a significant beneficial effect on symptoms improvement compared to a control intervention (3 studies, 206 participants, moderate quality evidence according to GRADE recommendations, pooled SMD 95%CI: -0.43 [-0.71, -0.15]). For other outcomes, quantitative analysis was not possible. Adverse events were mild, and no between-group difference were reported. Conclusion A symptom-limited aerobic exercise program is beneficial in improving the symptoms of adolescents who have sustained a SRC. Good quality studies are needed to determine effects on adults and other variables. This abstract has been published in full manuscript format and has the following citation: BMJ Citation https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32520867/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.050
Bibliometrics0.0080.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.243
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→