MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391388633 · doi:10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.3097

Harnessing the Power of EKC and RKC: A Sustainable Development Perspective

2024· article· en· W4391388633 on OpenAlex
Nesrine Dardouri, Mounir Smida

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Law and Sustainable Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicClimate Change Policy and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Power (physics)Sustainable developmentPolitical scienceRegional scienceSociologyComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to examine the validity and applicability of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory within the framework of the Resource Kuznets Curve (RKC). Specifically, the study aims to analyze empirical evidence and underlying factors to understand the relationship between environmental degradation and income levels across six major economies: Germany, France, Japan, Canada, UK, and US, spanning the period of 1961–2018. Methods: To achieve the objectives outlined, this study utilizes empirical analysis techniques. Data from the specified economies are collected and analyzed to discern patterns and relationships between environmental degradation, income levels, and other relevant variables. Statistical methods and econometric modeling are employed to evaluate the shape and dynamics of the relationship, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the complexities involved. Results: The analysis reveals both an N-shaped and a U-shaped pattern in the relationship between environmental degradation and income levels across the selected economies. These findings suggest that the relationship between environmental degradation and economic development is multifaceted and nonlinear, indicating the presence of critical thresholds and turning points. Furthermore, the study highlights the importance of clean energy consumption and renewable energy adoption in mitigating pollution and fostering sustainable economic growth. Conclusion: The findings of this study contribute to the ongoing debate surrounding the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory within the context of the Resource Kuznets Curve (RKC). The identification of an N-shaped and a U-shaped pattern underscores the need for nuanced policy interventions aimed at balancing economic development with environmental sustainability. Policymakers and stakeholders can utilize these insights to formulate effective strategies for promoting clean energy adoption, reducing pollution, and fostering long-term environmental quality and economic growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it