Pentosan Polysulfate Maculopathy With 13 Years of Follow-up Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To describe a case of pentosan polysulfate maculopathy progression with 13 years of follow-up imaging. Methods: A case was analyzed and a literature review performed. Results: A 65-year-old woman was referred to the retina service for a second opinion of a bilateral progressive pigmentary maculopathy. Her medical history was significant for interstitial cystitis that was actively treated with daily pentosan polysulfate since 2003. Multimodal imaging and fundus examination were consistent with pentosan polysulfate maculopathy. A review of records showed previous fundus imaging dating back 13 years that permitted longitudinal assessment of the disease course. Imaging findings were more prominent than the fundus examination findings. There was a 5-year period from the onset of parafoveal atrophy to foveal involvement. A pseudopodial pattern of disease expansion was seen on fundus autofluorescence. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this case represents the longest documented follow-up imaging of the progression of pentosan polysulfate maculopathy in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".