MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391394106 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.8

The characteristics of the circular hydraulic jump and vortex structure

2024· article· en· W4391394106 on OpenAlexaff
Wenxi Wang, Abdelkader Baayoun, Roger E. Khayat

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic jumpRADIUSJumpMechanicsVortexPhysicsFlow (mathematics)Surface tensionMaterials scienceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an effort to capture the continuous hydraulic jump and flow structure for a jet impinging on a disk, we recently proposed a composite mean-field thin-film approach consisting of subdividing the flow domain into three distinct connected regions of increasing gravity strength (Wang et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 966, 2023, A15). In the present study, we further validate our approach, and examine the characteristics and structure of the circular jump and recirculation. The influence of the disk radius is found to be significant, especially in the subcritical region. Below a disk radius, the jump transits from type Ia to type 0 after the recirculation zone has faded. The supercritical flow and jump location are insensitive to the disk size, but the jump length and height as well as the vortex size are strongly affected, all decreasing with decreasing disk radius, exhibiting a maximum with the flow rate for a small disk. The jump is relatively steep with a strong recirculation zone for a high obstacle at the disk edge. Comparison against the Navier–Stokes solution of Askarizadeh et al. (Phys. Rev. Fluids, vol. 4, 2019, 114002; Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 146, 2020, 118823) for the weak and intermediate surface tension suggests that the surface tension effect is unimportant for a high obstacle for a jump of type 0 or type Ia. The film thickness at the disk edge for a freely draining film is found to comprise, in addition to a static component (capillary length), a dynamic component: ${h_\infty }\sim {(Fr/{r_\infty })^{2/3}}$ that we establish by minimizing the Gibbs free energy at the disk edge, and, equivalently, is also the consequence of the flow becoming supercritical near the edge. By assuming negligible film slope and curvature at the leading edge of the jump and maximum height at the trailing edge, we show that the jump length is related to the jump radius as ${L_J}\sim Re{(F{r^2}/{r_J}^5)^{1/3}}$ . The vortex length follows the same behaviour. The energy loss and conjugate depth ratio exhibit a maximum with the flow rate, which we show to originate from the descending and ascending branches of the supercritical film thickness. The presence of the jump is not necessarily commensurate with that of a recirculation; the existence of the vortex closely depends on the upstream curvature and steepness of the jump. The surface separating the regions of existence/non-existence of the recirculation is given by the universal relation $R{e^{10/3}}F{r^2} = 9r_\infty ^9/50$ . The jump can be washed off the edge of the disk, particularly at low viscosity and small disk size. The flow in the supercritical region remains insensitive to the change in gravity level and disk size but is greatly affected by viscosity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207