MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391394383 · doi:10.4289/0013-8797.125.2.268

On the Hosts and Larval Habits of Framinghamia helvalis (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

2024· article· en· W4391394383 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles S. Eiseman

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrambidaeLepidoptera genitaliaLarvaBiologyZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Framinghamia helvalis (Walker) (Crambidae), the sole representative of its genus, is a nondescript moth that occurs from Nova Scotia to Saskatchewan and throughout the eastern and central USA (Allyson 1984). The larva has long been known to feed on species of Populus L. and Salix L. (Salicaceae), but little has been published about its habits. Forbes (1923) stated that the caterpillar “is a leaf roller on poplar, emerging in July” in New York. According to Jones and Kimball (1943), on Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, the larvae are “not rare on willow and poplar, the second annual brood overwintering as larvae in neatly-made leaf-packets which fall to the ground.” Prentice (1965) reported P. nigra f. italica (Münchh.) A. Andersen as a host and noted that the larva is solitary. Allyson (1984) described and illustrated the final instar larva (which is up to 23 mm long), additionally listing P. tremuloides Michx. as a host. Godfrey et al. (1987) reported this species being reared from P. deltoides W. Bartram ex Marshall in Illinois, with the adult emerging on 23 July. I recently had the opportunity to observe the “leaf-packets” made by mature larvae as well as the previously unreported habits of early instars. In each of the rearing events discussed below, I confirmed the moth identification by dissecting an adult male, whose genitalia matched the description and illustration in Munroe (1951).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Entomological Society of WashingtonSame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207