Structure of the Assemblages of Round Fungus Beetles (Leiodidae: Cholevinae and Leiodinae) Collected with Carrion-Baited Traps in Four Forest Types in the Haravéri Botanical Garden, San Sebastián Del Oeste, Jalisco, México
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four assemblages of Leiodidae were studied by sampling with carrion-baited traps, from August 2019 to July 2020, in four types of vegetation (sub-deciduous forest, cloud forest, oak forest, and pine forest) in the Haravéri Botanical Garden, San Sebastián del Oeste, Jalisco, México. A total of 1196 cholevine and one leiodine leiodids were collected. Dissochaetus was the most abundant and diverse genus with 1159 specimens representing six species. Dissochaetus sp. 1 was the most abundant species, with 360 individuals. Additionally, 36 specimens of Adelopsis and one specimen of Liocyrtusa were collected. Species seasonal activity differs by vegetation type. Winter was the season with the highest abundance. Of the four types of vegetation, cloud forest had the most diverse and abundant cholevine fauna, while pine forest had the least abundance. An additional three species of Dissochaetus were found, but not determined to species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".