MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391402236 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.190111

The Effect of Village Income on Village Expenditure: A Case Study of Belitung Regency

2024· article· en· W4391402236 on OpenAlex
Asep Hariyanto, Bambang Juanda, Ernan Rustiadi, Sri Mulatsih

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultural economicsSocioeconomicsGeographyEconomicsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development progress of rural areas generally lags behind that of urban areas.To bridge this gap, the support of various factors is essential, with financing being one of the key elements.In rural regions, several financing sources can be utilized to bolster development efforts, such as Village Original Income (PAD), Transfer Funds, and other financial resources.Belitung Regency, as an archipelagic area within the Bangka Belitung Islands Province, undoubtedly requires financial support to foster developmental progress within its jurisdiction, given the pivotal role of financing in development.To comprehend the impact of financing, particularly on village expenditures in rural locales, it is imperative to undertake research.Hence, this study is designed to examine and analyze the influence of village income on village expenditures in Belitung Regency.The Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) is one analytical model applicable for assessing the impact of village income on village expenditure.Data for this study is amassed through observation, with some obtained from specific agencies.Utilizing the GWR analytical model will elucidate the varying influences of village income on village expenditure across individual villages, since the GWR method is an advanced form of simple regression analysis that incorporates spatial elements to yield more granular, regionspecific outcomes.The findings from the GWR analysis indicate that village funds and allocations have a positive effect on village expenditures in certain areas, signifying that they can increase spending.However, in other regions, these same financial instruments display a negative impact due to poor planning.Additionally, variables such as profit sharing, bank interest, aid grants, and general village original income positively influence village spending, suggesting that an increase in these variables can bolster spending in Belitung Regency.It is recommended that stakeholders engage in meticulous financial planning to maximize the potential of village funds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it