MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

6.13 The effect of pre-existing mental health conditions on symptom recovery outcomes in adolescents with sport-related concussion

2024· article· en· W4391406661 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth F. Teel, Nathan E. Cook, Grant L. Iverson, Douglas P. Terry, Isabelle Gagnon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyDepression (economics)ConcussionMedicineMental healthOdds ratioPoison controlPsychological interventionPhysical therapyInjury preventionPsychiatryInternal medicineEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To determine if pre-existing mental health conditions are associated with symptom outcomes following sport-related concussion (SRC) in adolescents. Design Secondary analysis of prospective, multisite cohort (5P Study). Setting Canadian pediatric emergency departments (PED, n=9). Participants Adolescents with SRC (n=968; age=15.1±1.3yrs; 57.6% male). Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors) Adolescents were categorized as pre-existing anxiety only (n=61), depression only (n=17), anxiety and depression (n=32), or control (no mental health diagnoses, n=858) based on self-reported medical history. Participants completed the Post-Concussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) in the PED and at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12-weeks post-injury. Outcome Measures PCSI change scores (total post-injury minus pre-injury symptoms) were calculated, with higher scores indicating more frequent/severe symptoms post-injury. Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms (PPCS) were defined as three new/worse symptoms relative to pre-injury scores at the 4-week assessment. Main Results Pre-existing depression and combined anxiety/depression groups had significantly higher symptom scores across the study period than controls in univariate analyses (p=0.003); however, symptom resolution over time did not differ by group (i.e. no interaction effect, p=0.50). Youth with combined anxiety/depression (n=18, 64.3%) had higher odds of experiencing PPCS than controls (n=337; Odds Ratio= 2.64, 95% CI= 1.20, 5.81; p=0.016). In multivariate analyses, mental health status was not related to symptom recovery (group effect: p=0.32, interaction effect= p=0.46) or PPCS risk (p=0.62). Conclusions Combined anxiety/depression diagnoses were associated with worse symptom outcomes in univariate models, but this association was not present when controlling for known covariates of symptom recovery. Future studies should evaluate mental health status on other clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→