MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391416523 · doi:10.1515/9781571136886-001

Preface

2007· book-chapter· en· W4391416523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBoydell and Brewer eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T HIS BOOK IS THE PALPABLE RESULT of my longtime love affair withCanadian short fiction, which dates back to the 1980s.Having taught Canadian short fiction and the North American short story off and on and in various contexts over the past two decades, the relative dearth of criticism on this particular body of texts on the Canadian side of the 49th parallel struck me repeatedly.Yet I had to cross the threshold into the twenty-first century before I decided to do my share about this in book form and in English.I hope that this volume will help to contextualize individual writers and their stories and further raise the profile of the Canadian short story, as it so much deserves next to its well-established American counterpart.I am grateful to everyone who lent a hand to make this undertaking possible: First of all my American publishers at Camden House, who agreed that this book project should see the light of day and who then accompanied the editing and production process with their usual expertise and kindness.I also thank my twenty-six co-authors, who produced enlightening studies of major Canadian short fiction writers and particularly prominent or representative examples of their stories.All the contributors to this book, appearing in the book series European Studies in American Literature and Culture, are or have been affiliated with German, Austrian, and Swiss universities.All of them are engaged, among other things, with Canadian literature.This book, then, is also a tribute to the international involvement with Canadian short fiction, here referring especially to the "Canadophile" German-speaking countries.I made a point of inviting a mixture of senior, established, up-and-coming, and still very young scholars, in order to illustrate the continuing tradition of involvement with Can-Lit in the German-speaking countries and elsewhere.I find the way the younger contributors have taken up the challenge especially gratifying.Theirs is the future of Canadian studies, and it seems that the field is in very good hands.I particularly want to thank my highly competent and efficient AmCan team at the University of Constance, without whose conscientious efforts it would not have been possible to complete this daunting project within a manageable period of time: Julia Breitbach and Florian Freitag in particular, but also Eva Gruber and Georgiana Banita were very helpful in editing this volume.Emily Petermann, my American native speaker, who found her way

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4250.213

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoydell and Brewer eBooksSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207