Associations of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome With Indicators of Brain Health at Midlife in the CARDIA Cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common reproductive disorder associated with an adverse cardiometabolic profile early in life. Increasing evidence links cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes and hypertension, to accelerated cognitive aging. However, less is known about PCOS and its relationship to brain health, particularly at midlife. Our goal was to investigate possible associations between PCOS and midlife cognitive function and brain MRI findings in an ongoing prospective study. METHODS: We used data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, a geographically diverse prospective cohort study of individuals who were 18-30 years at baseline (1985-1986) and followed for 30 years. We identified women with PCOS from an ancillary study (CARDIA Women's study (CWS); n = 1,163) as those with elevated androgen levels and/or hirsutism in conjunction with symptoms of oligomenorrhea. At year 30, participants completed cognitive testing, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) (verbal learning and memory), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (processing speed and executive function), Stroop test (attention and cognitive control), and category and letter fluency tests (semantics and attention). A subset completed brain MRI to assess brain structure and white matter integrity. Multivariable linear regression models estimated the association between PCOS and outcomes, adjusting for age, race, education, and study center. RESULTS: = 0.002), though not abnormal white matter. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that women with PCOS have lower cognitive performance and lower white matter integrity at midlife. Additional research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine potential mechanistic pathways including potential modifiable factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".