Structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete beams under repeated loading
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In structural engineering, structural health monitoring (SHM) has gained popularity as a technique for examining loads, straining actions, environmental factors, and structural behavior under various loads. In this paper, the effect of damage induced in reinforced concrete beams under repeated loading is experimentally investigated. More precisely, eight beams are used to investigate their ductility and energy dissipation as well as to assess the feasibility of using the wireless sensor technique in the SHM processes of the structure. Resensys SenSpot™ sensors are used for developing the wireless SHM system for this study. The defects experimentally induced include the development of cracks at the bottom middle span, the voids at the concrete mold, and the partially unbonded steel at the middle bottom reinforcement. All of the beams, each with a rectangular cross section with identical dimensions of 200 mm by 300 mm and a length of 2000 mm, are tested using the three-point bending load. LVDTs and wireless tilting sensors are mounted on the eight test specimens. The findings show that any type of damage significantly reduces the ultimate capacities and the results from the Resensys SenScope™ system concur with those from the experimental findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it