Abstract TP282: Impact of Interhospital Transfer on Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke From a Comprehensive Stroke Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate how interhospital transfers impact the correlation between functional outcomes, mortality, reperfusion rates, and workflow time metrics in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). Background: This analysis is based on a prospective database encompassing consecutive patients who underwent EVT for LVO between January 2021 and June 2023 at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC). Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures assessed include the rate of favorable 90-day functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-2), successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale grade 2b or 3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Additionally, essential workflow time metric milestones were analyzed. Results: Out of 363 patients, 172 (47.4%) were transferred from other hospitals. The transferred patients were relatively younger than those who presented directly (66.5 ± 15.6 vs. 70.6 ± 14.5). No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics, including gender, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and the rate of intravenous thrombolysis, between the transferred and direct presentation groups (all p > 0.05). The time of symptom onset to groin puncture time was significantly higher for the transfer group (703.6 min vs. 394.5 min, p < 0.0001), while comparable figures were noted for groin puncture to reperfusion time (43.9 min vs. 45.1 min, p = 0.7071) and ICU length of stay (70.8 hours vs. 59.3 hours, p = 0.7071) between the two cohorts. Similar rates were also seen for successful reperfusion (p = 0.2348), sICH (p = 0.4933), favorable 90-day functional outcomes (p = 0.9457), mortality (p = 0.8534), and composite complications during hospitalization (p = 0.5779). Conclusion: Although we observed significantly longer time intervals from symptom onset to initiation of mechanical thrombectomy in patients transferred from outside facilities, there were no adverse consequences on patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".