MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391438368 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.86

Abstract 86: Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy for Late Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Pre-Stroke Disability

2024· article· en· W4391438368 on OpenAlexaff
Kanta Tanaka, Hiroshi Yamagami, Muhammad M. Qureshi, Kazutaka Uchida, James E. Siegler, Raul G. Nogueira, Shinichi Yoshimura, Nobuyuki Sakai, Daniel Strbian, Simon Nagel, Jelle Demeestere, Volker Puetz, Diogo C Haussen, Mohamad Abdalkader, Marta Olivé‐Gadea, Mahmoud Mohammaden, João Pedro Marto, Anne Dusart, Simon Winzer, Liisa Tomppo, François Caparros, Hilde Hénon, Flavio Bellante, João Nuno Ramos, Santiago Ortega‐Gutiérrez, Sunil A. Sheth, Stefania Nannoni, Johannes Kaesmacher, Lieselotte Vandewalle, Nicolas Martinez‐Majander, Sergio Salazar‐Marioni, Mudassir Farooqui, Pekka Virtanen, Rita Ventura, Syed Zaidi, Alicia C. Castonguay, Ajit S Puri, Behzad Farzin, Hesham Masoud, Piers Klein, Davide Strambo, Markus Möhlenbruch, Peter A. Ringleb, Osama O. Zaidat, Jean Saint Raymond, Robin Lemmens, Marc Ribó, Patrik Michel, Thanh N. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleStroke (engine)Odds ratioConfidence intervalLogistic regressionInternal medicinePhysical therapySurgeryIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: There is a paucity of research to develop evidence-based recommendations for endovascular management in the extended time window (>6 hours after time last seen well [TLSW]) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with pre-stroke disability. Methods: We analyzed data from a multinational cohort (66 sites, 10 countries from 2014 to 2022) of acute ischemic stroke patients with pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-4 and anterior or posterior circulation LVO who received endovascular therapy 6-24 hours after TLSW. The primary outcome was the composite of functional independence (FI, mRS 0-2) or return to pre-stroke mRS (return of Rankin, RoR) at 90 days. Outcomes were compared between patients with pre-stroke disability (pre-stroke mRS 2-4) vs those without (mRS 0-1). Results: There were 2231 patients (median age 77 years; median NIH Stroke Scale 16) included in the present study, of whom 564 (25.3%) had pre-stroke disability. The primary outcome (FI or ROR) was seen in 30.7% of patients with pre-stroke disability (FI, 16.5%; RoR 30.7%), compared with 44.1% of those without (FI, 44.1%; RoR 13.0%) ( P <0.0001, Figure 1 ). In both multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, pre-stroke disability was not associated with a lower odds of achieving FI or RoR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.15 and aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.43-1.25, respectively). FI or ROR was achieved at a higher percentage with reperfusion with mTICI ≥2b than with mTICI 0-2a, both in patients with pre-stroke disability (34.8% vs 10.8%, P <0.0001) and in those without (49.2% vs 12.1%, P <0.0001). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 6.3% in both groups ( P =0.995). Conclusions: A substantial proportion of late LVO patients with pre-stroke disability regained pre-stroke mRS after EVT and did not have a worse functional prognosis than patients without pre-stroke disability when their pre-stroke mRS was considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→