MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391448157 · doi:10.1093/ismeco/ycae019

Does soil history decline in influencing the structure of bacterial communities of <i>Brassica napus</i> host plants across different growth stages?

2024· article· en· W4391448157 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew J.C. Blakney, Marc St‐Arnaud, Mohamed Hijri

Bibliographic record

VenueISME Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanola Council of Canada
KeywordsRhizosphereCanolaBiologyBulk soilBrassicaAgronomyGrowing seasonHost (biology)SeedlingEcologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soil history has been shown to condition future rhizosphere microbial communities. However, previous experiments have also illustrated that mature, adult plants can “re-write,” or mask, different soil histories through host plant–soil community feedbacks. This leaves a knowledge gap concerning how soil history influences bacterial community structure across different growth stages. Thus, here we tested the hypothesis that previously established soil histories will decrease in influencing the structure of Brassica napus bacterial communities over the growing season. We used an on-going agricultural field experiment to establish three different soil histories, plots of monocrop canola (B. napus), or rotations of wheat-canola, or pea-barley-canola. During the following season, we repeatedly sampled the surrounding bulk soil, rhizosphere, and roots of the B. napus hosts at different growth stages—the initial seeding conditions, seedling, rosette, bolting, and flower—from all three soil history plots. We compared composition and diversity of the B. napus soil bacterial communities, as estimated using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding, to identify any changes associated with soil history and growth stages. We found that soil history remained significant across each growth stage in structuring the bacterial bulk soil and rhizosphere communities, but not the bacterial root communities. This suggests that the host plant’s capacity to “re-write” different soil histories may be quite limited as key components that constitute the soil history’s identity remain present, such that the previously established soil history continues to impact the bacterial rhizosphere communities, but not the root communities. For agriculture, this highlights how previously established soil histories persist and may have important long-term consequences on future plant–microbe communities, including bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISME CommunicationsSame topicMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207