MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391448469 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.46

Abstract 46: Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated With Lower Mortality After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the Get With the Guidelines Registry

2024· article· en· W4391448469 on OpenAlexaff
Santosh B. Murthy, Cenai Zhang, Andew Garton, Brian Mac Grory, Shreyansh Shah, Gregg C. Fonarow, Lee H. Schwamm, Deepak L. Bhatt, Eric E. Smith, Guido J. Falcone, Jared Knopman, Wendy Ziai, Hooman Kamel, Kevin N. Sheth

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntracerebral hemorrhageSpontaneous intracerebral hemorrhageStroke (engine)Ischemic strokeSurgeryEmergency medicineGeneral surgeryInternal medicineSubarachnoid hemorrhageIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The efficacy of emergent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in improving outcomes after non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear, with two randomized clinical trials (MISTIE III and ENRICH) showing conflicting results. We therefore sought to evaluate the association of MIS for ICH with outcomes in a real-world, nationally representative cohort. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with ICH in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry, between 2011 and 2021. Patients who underwent open craniotomy/craniectomy and those transferred to another hospital were excluded. The study exposure was MIS, defined as a composite of stereotactic surgical evacuation and endoscopic surgical evacuation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. In the primary analysis, we matched patients who underwent MIS with medically managed patients in a 1:1 manner on age, sex, race, NIH Stroke Scale, prior antithrombotic therapy, and external ventricular drain use. Logistic regression was used while adjusting for withdrawal of care. In secondary analyses, stereotactic and endoscopic surgical approaches were analyzed separately. Results: Among 555,964 patients with ICH, MIS was performed in 703 patients (330 had stereotactic surgery; 391 had endoscopic surgery). The matched cohort included 485 patients in each group. Median time to surgery was 1 day (IQR, 1-2). In-hospital deaths occurred in 63 (13%) with MIS and 96 (20%) without surgery. Medically managed patients had more vascular comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and prior stroke than those who underwent MIS. In regression analyses adjusted for withdrawal of care, MIS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality at discharge (aOR, 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.6). In secondary analyses, stereotactic surgery (aOR, 0.3; CI, 0.2-0.6) and endoscopic surgery (aOR, 0.6; CI, 0.3-0.9) were also independently associated with lower mortality. Conclusions: In a large heterogeneous US cohort of ICH patients, emergent MIS was associated with lower in-hospital mortality. Longer-term follow up data with ascertainment of functional outcomes may shed more light on the benefit of surgery after ICH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207