MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391448541 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.145

Abstract 145: Anticoagulation-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Time to Reversal Treatment After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in the United States

2024· article· en· W4391448541 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin N. Sheth, Nicole Solomon, Brooke Alhanti, Steven R. Messé, Ying Xian, Deepak L. Bhatt, Claude Hemphill, Jennifer Frontera, Ray Chang, Ilya Danelich, Joanna Huang, Lee H. Schwamm, Eric E. Smith, Joshua N. Goldstein, Brian MacGrory, Gregg C. Fonarow, Jeffrey L. Saver

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntracerebral hemorrhageStroke (engine)Logistic regressionOdds ratioWarfarinInternal medicineAnesthesiaCardiologySurgeryAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (AC-ICH) often results in death. Specific reversal agents are available, but it is not clear whether there is a time-dependent treatment effect. We characterized patients with AC-ICH and investigated the relationship between time to treatment and outcome. Methods: We analyzed data from 9492 AC-ICH patients who presented within 24 hours of onset across 465 hospitals reporting any anticoagulation reversal treatment in GWTG-Stroke from 2015 to 2021. For patients with available door-to-treatment (DTT) times, outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression models adjusted for demographic, history, baseline, and hospital characteristics. A spline plot for mortality was generated for DTT and in-patient mortality from the adjusted predicted outcome probability. Results: Among 9492 patients admitted within 24h of AC-ICH, the median age was 77 years, 45% female, and NIHSS median 11. 79% (7469) received reversal treatment and 21% (2143) did not. Among reversal patients, pretreatment AC was warfarin in 62.2% and a direct oral anticoagulant in 37.8%. For 5224 patients with documented times, median onset to treatment time was 232 (IQR 142-185) minutes and DTT was 82 (58-117) mins, with DTT ≤60m for 27.7%. DTT ≤60 minutes was associated with lower odds of mortality than a DTT of >61-180 minutes (aOR 0.83 [95% CI: 0.69-1.00]). Factors associated with DTT ≤ 60 minutes include white non-Hispanic race, higher blood pressure, lower NIHSS, and a larger hospital size. Spline plotting showed a steep mortality increase with longer DTT in the first 30-minutes post-arrival (Figure). Conclusion: In US hospitals participating in GWTG-Stroke reporting reversal therapy, most patients with AC-ICH received reversal agents. Earlier administration was associated with improved survival. These findings support intensive efforts to accelerate evaluation and treatment for patients with this devastating form of stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchFrench-language works237,207