MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391449272 · doi:10.1503/jpn.230079

Reviving: restoring depression-like behaviour through glial cell–derived neurotrophic factor treatment in the medial prefrontal cortex

2024· article· en· W4391449272 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yehao Liu, Xiaoyu Zhou, Ke Xue, Ruiao Sun, Yan Tang, Chuanxi Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlial cell line-derived neurotrophic factorNeurotrophic factorsPrefrontal cortexBehavioural despair testDopamineNeuroscienceMPTPEndocrinologyPsychologyInternal medicineOpen fieldBrain-derived neurotrophic factorTail suspension testTyrosine hydroxylaseAntidepressantMedicineReceptorDopaminergicHippocampus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Depression is a prevalent nonmotor symptom in Parkinson disease and can greatly reduce the quality of life for patients; the dopamine receptors found in glutamatergic pyramidal cells in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) play a role in regulating local field activity, which in turn affects behavioural and mood disorders. Given research showing that glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) may have an antidepressant effect, we sought to evaluate the impact of exogenous GDNF on depression-like behaviour in mouse models of Parkinson disease. METHODS: We used an established subacute model of Parkinson disease in mice involving intraperitoneal injection of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), followed by brain stereotaxic injection of GDNF into the mPFC region. Subsequently, we assessed depression-like behaviour using the sucrose preference test, forced swimming test and tail suspension test, while also evaluating protein expression in the mPFC. RESULTS: We included 60 mice, divided into 3 groups, including a control group (saline injection), an MPTP plus saline injection group and an MPTP plus GDNF injection group. We found that exogenous GDNF injection into the mPFC led to an increase in dopamine receptor D1 (DRD1) protein levels. We also observed that activating the protein kinase A pathway through DRD1 produced a prolonged antidepressant response. Under GDNF stimulation, the expression of dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) remained constant, suggesting that the DRD2 signal was ineffective in alleviating depression-like symptoms. Moreover, our investigation involved Golgi staining and Western blot techniques, which found enhanced synaptic plasticity, including increased dendritic branches, dendritic spines and retrograde protection after GDNF treatment in Parkinson disease models. LIMITATIONS: A subtle motor phenotype became evident only toward the conclusion of the behavioural testing period. The study exclusively involved male mice, and no separate control group receiving only GDNF treatment was included in the experimental design. CONCLUSION: Our findings support a positive effect of exogenous GDNF on synaptic plasticity, mediated by DRD1 signalling in the mPFC, which could facilitate depression remission in Parkinson disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207