Weight Loss Using an mHealth App Among Individuals With Obesity in Different Economic Regions of China: Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: With the increasing prevalence of obesity, weight loss has become a critical issue in China. Self-managed weight loss through a mobile health (mHealth) app may be a prospective method. However, its practicability in different economic regions of China is unknown. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of self-managed weight loss through an mHealth app among individuals with obesity in different economic regions of China and to demonstrate the feasibility of online self-management for weight loss. Methods: A total of 165,635 Chinese adults who signed up for the mHealth app were included to analyze the body composition characteristics of individuals from different economic regions by χ2 analyses. Furthermore, 2 types of participants with obesity using mHealth monitoring, including 74,611 participants with a BMI ≥24.0 kg/m2 and 22,903 participants with a normal BMI but an excessive percentage of body fat (PBF), were followed for 6 months to explore the weight loss and fat loss effects in different economic regions of China and to find independent predictors associated with weight loss success by 2-tailed Student t test and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: There were 32,129 users from low-income regions and 133,506 users from high-income regions. The proportion of users with obesity in low-income regions was higher than in high-income regions, both based on BMI (15,378/32,129, 47.9% vs 59,233/133,506, 44.4%; P<.001) and PBF classification (19,146/32,129, 59.6% vs 72,033/133,506, 54%; P<.001). Follow-up analyses showed that the weight loss effect among participants with overweight or obesity in low-income regions was greater than in high-income regions (mean -4.93, SD 6.41 vs mean -4.71, SD 6.14 kg; P<.001), while there was no significant difference in fat loss (mean -2.06%, SD 3.14% vs mean -2.04%, SD 3.19%; P=.54). In the population with normal-weight obesity, the weight loss (mean -2.42, SD 4.07 vs mean -2.23, SD 4.21 kg; P=.004) and fat loss effects (mean -1.43%, SD 2.73% vs mean -1.27%, SD 2.63%; P<.001) were stronger in high-income regions than in low-income regions. In addition, multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that age, baseline PBF, skeletal muscle rate, and measurement frequency were related to weight loss, whereas gender and baseline body metabolic rate only showed a correlation with weight loss in the population in high-income regions. Conclusions: This study found a high proportion of mHealth app users with obesity in low-income regions. Individuals with overweight and obesity in different economic regions of China experienced significant weight loss and fat loss using an mHealth app. Moreover, individuals in high-income regions paid more attention to body fat and had better fat reduction effects. Therefore, promoting self-monitoring of weight and PBF through an mHealth app could be an important intervention that could be implemented across all regions of China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".