Analytical corrections for <i>B</i><sub>1</sub>‐inhomogeneity and signal decay in multi‐slice 2D spiral hyperpolarized <sup>129</sup>Xe MRI using keyhole reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Hyperpolarized xenon MRI suffers from heterogeneous coil bias and magnetization decay that obscure pulmonary abnormalities. Non-physiological signal variability can be mitigated by measuring and mapping the nominal flip angle, and by rescaling the images to correct for signal bias and decay. While flip angle maps can be calculated from sequentially acquired images, scan time and breath-hold duration are doubled. Here, we exploit the low-frequency oversampling of 2D-spiral and keyhole reconstruction to measure flip angle maps from a single acquisition. METHODS: Flip angle maps were calculated from two images generated from a single dataset using keyhole reconstructions and a Bloch-equation-based model suitable for hyperpolarized substances. Artifacts resulting from acquisition and reconstruction schemes (e.g., keyhole reconstruction radius, slice-selection profile, spiral-ordering, and oversampling) were assessed using point-spread functions. Simulated flip angle maps generated using keyhole reconstruction were compared against the paired-image approach using RMS error (RMSE). Finally, feasibility was demonstrated for in vivo xenon ventilation imaging. RESULTS: -inhomogeneity correction can be generated with only 1.25-fold central-oversampling and keyhole reconstruction radius = 5% (RMSE = 0.460°). These settings also generated accurate flip angle maps in a healthy control (RSME = 0.337°) and a person with cystic fibrosis (RMSE = 0.404°) in as little as 3.3 s. CONCLUSION: -inhomogeneity can be acquired rapidly by combining 2D-spiral acquisition, Bloch-equation-based modeling, and keyhole reconstruction. This approach will be especially useful for breath-hold studies where short scan durations are necessary, such as dynamic imaging and applications in children or people with severely compromised respiratory function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".