MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391463963 · doi:10.23880/whsj-16000205

Midwifery of the Future: A Widening Field of Competences

2024· article· en· W4391463963 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rehan Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s Health Science Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of KarachiUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsField (mathematics)ObstetricsSociologyEngineering ethicsPolitical scienceMedicineEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field of midwifery has been developing rapidly, reflecting the changing landscape of healthcare and the different needs of anticipating mothers and their classifications. Midwifery, which formerly generally guided labour, has expanded into an inclusive rule of competence that extends far beyond the delivery room. This conversion is designed to meet the complete healthcare needs of mothers throughout their generative journey from prejudice to postpartum. Modern midwives are progressively being acknowledged as basic healthcare providers who offer care continuation. They carry an extended collection of competencies, encompassing not only reproductive support but also gynaecological care, birth control, intercourse wellbeing education, and menopausal support. Midwives have adapted to different educational circumstances, forging alliances with obstetricians, nurses, and additional healthcare professionals to ensure logical woman-centred care. In terms of mathematical health, midwives influence electronics to support telehealth duties, monitor high-risk pregnancies by chance, and offer approachable instruction and support through traveling apps and platforms. This enlarging field of competencies involves a powerful emphasis on mental well-being, as midwives play a critical role in labeling perinatal mood disorders and providing psychological support to wives. Furthermore, midwifery has taken up evidence-based practices, fostering an education of research and novelty. Midwives help with the implementation of best practices, ensuring first-rate care of their cases. They undertake constant education, stop next to new healing advancements, and maintain their guidance abilities to advocate for mothers’ well-being and reproductive rights. As midwifery continues to progress, cooperation with healthcare providers, policymakers, and society is essential. By admitting the extending competencies of midwives, we can ensure that girls endure inclusive, sympathetic, and mankind’s welfare and competent care during the whole of their generative journey, forming the future of midwifery as a necessary component of modern healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.024
Scholarly communication0.0110.014
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0060.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s Health Science JournalSame topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207