MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391475564 · doi:10.5962/p.363784

Diet of the Prairie Rattlesnake, Crotalus viridis viridis, in southeastern Alberta

2001· article· en· W4391475564 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
M. Hill, G. Lawrence Powell, Anthony P. Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrotalusBiologyZoologyEcologyVenom

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The diet of the Prairie Rattlesnake, Crotalus viridis viridis, in a multiple land use area in southeastern Alberta was investigated by examining the gut contents of 20 road-killed individuals and the composition of eight scats recovered from sequestered individuals.All individuals yielding dietary data were adults.No data on the composition of the local small mammal community are available.The number of prey items per snake varied (gut contents: 0-4 items; scat samples: 1-3 items).Frequency of occurrence (individual prey items) was: Sagebrush Vole (Lagurus curtatus) -53% gut contents, 68% scats; Meadow Vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) -38% gut contents, 8% scats; Olive-Backed Pocket Mouse (Perognathus maniculatus) -8% scats; Western Jumping Mouse (Zapus princeps) -8% scats; Richardson's Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus richardsonii) -8% scats; unidentified passerines -9% gut contents.Although individual rattlesnakes sometimes took more than one prey taxon (gut contents: 1-3 taxa; scat samples: 1-2 taxa), multiple prey items in a single gut were almost always of the same species, suggesting that individual rattlesnakes tend to exploit patches where colonial burrowing prey species are abundant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207