MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391475657 · doi:10.5962/p.363809

Snipes of the Western Palearctic, by Richard Rouxel [Review]

2001· article· en· W4391475657 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roy John

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryEnvironmental ethicsCognitive scienceEpistemologyPsychoanalysisPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book is a detailed scientific review of the published information on the Common Snipe (Gallinago gallinago), Jack Snipe (Lymnocryptes minimus), and Great Snipe (Gallinago media).It does not include Pintail Snipe (Gallinago stenura), which live at the western edge of the Western Palearctic, between the Pechora and Chornaya River basins across to the Urals (Russia).Nor does it include a discussion of Common Snipe in North and South America, although many North American texts are cited (particularly Tuck's CWS monograph on snipe).In addition, it does not clarify the status of an African subspecies of Common Snipe mentioned in the EBCC Atlas of European Birds (often considered full specie -G.nigripennis).After an introduction to the taxonomy of Charadriiformes through to the Gallinagininae, the author begins on the species accounts.About half the book is devoted to the Common Snipe and the balance split between the other two species.Each account contains a very detailed description of these birds.This is literally a feather by feather description of the important feather tracts that might help the researcher determine age and sex.These descriptions also include the molt sequences.Other biometrics such as measurements and weight contribute to information that could be used on captured birds.Most of this material would not be useful for field observations.The section on voice, however, is more helpful for field identification.The section on breeding is heavily weighted on distribution and numbers.For Europe the breeding population is estimated at 800 000 to 1 000 000. Adding in the Russian estimate of 1 to 10 million makes the range of the estimate a little absurd.Nesting, egg-laying and nurturing chicks is also described in detail.The movement of birds both diurnally and on migration leads to population estimates and a solid discussion on the validity of the data.This is then linked to mortality, particularly hunting.From even a cursory glance it is obvious that northern Europe is the snipe "factory" for hunters located in southern Europe.This pattern is followed for all three species of snipe.There is less information on Jack Snipe, presumably because of its secretive nature.There is somewhat more on the Great Snipe, which at least can be counted during its lek displays.As the Common

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→