Dispersal from and fidelity to a hibernaculum in a northern Vermont population of Common Map Turtles, Graptemys geographica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dispersal from and fidelity to a hibernaculum in a northern Vermont population of Common Map Turtles, Graptemys geographica.Canadian Field-Naturalist 114(3): 405-408.Adult female Common Map Turtles, Graptemys geographica, ranging in carapace length from 160-260 mm were tracked with sonic equipment from November 1997 to November 1998.Seven of the 15 turtles tagged initially in 1997 returned to the same river hibernaculum in 1998.SCUBA observation demonstrated that hibernating females clustered together shell to shell in small and large groups often piled upon one another.They wintered fully exposed (unburied) but frequently positioned themselves against bottom debris (rocks, ledge outcrops, submerged logs).Ice covered the river from December through March.In April, when the ice had thawed, the animals emigrated to their summer home ranges.Range length for 6 females was 1.5 -8.0 km along the river course.Total movements outside the hibernaculum ranged from 3.1 -15.4 km.Some individuals moved downstream to Lake Champlain (2.7 km) and along the lakeshore as much as 2.2 km from the river's mouth.One individual moved 5.8 km upstream, then headed 9.5 km downstream to the lake before returning to the hibernaculum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".