MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391475664 · doi:10.5962/p.363992

Dispersal from and fidelity to a hibernaculum in a northern Vermont population of Common Map Turtles, Graptemys geographica

2000· article· en· W4391475664 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Terry E. Graham, Cyntha B. Graham, Carols E. Crocker, Gordon R. Ultsch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeographyBiological dispersalPopulationEcologyDemographyBiologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adult female Common Map Turtles, Graptemys geographica, ranging in carapace length from 160-260 mm were tracked with sonic equipment from November 1997 to November 1998.Seven of the 15 turtles tagged initially in 1997 returned to the same river hibernaculum in 1998.SCUBA observation demonstrated that hibernating females clustered together shell to shell in small and large groups often piled upon one another.They wintered fully exposed (unburied) but frequently positioned themselves against bottom debris (rocks, ledge outcrops, submerged logs).Ice covered the river from December through March.In April, when the ice had thawed, the animals emigrated to their summer home ranges.Range length for 6 females was 1.5 -8.0 km along the river course.Total movements outside the hibernaculum ranged from 3.1 -15.4 km.Some individuals moved downstream to Lake Champlain (2.7 km) and along the lakeshore as much as 2.2 km from the river's mouth.One individual moved 5.8 km upstream, then headed 9.5 km downstream to the lake before returning to the hibernaculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207