Using low-cost air quality sensors to estimate wildfire smoke infiltration into childcare facilities in British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The health risks associated with wildfires are expected to increase due to climate change. Children are susceptible to wildfire smoke, but little is known about indoor smoke exposure at childcare facilities. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the effects of outdoor PM 2.5 and wildfire smoke episodes on indoor PM 2.5 at childcare facilities across British Columbia, Canada. We installed low-cost air-quality sensors inside and outside 45 childcare facilities and focused our analysis on operational hours (Monday–Friday, 08:00–18:00) during the 2022 wildfire season (01 August–31 October). Using random-slope random-intercept linear mixed effects regression, we estimated the overall and facility-specific effects of outdoor PM 2.5 on indoor PM 2.5 , while accounting for covariates. We examined how wildfire smoke affected this relationship by separately analyzing days with and without wildfire smoke. Average indoor PM 2.5 increased by 235% on wildfire days across facilities. There was a positive relationship between outdoor and indoor PM 2.5 that was not strongly influenced by linear adjustment for meteorological and area-based socio-economic factors. A 1.0 μ g m −3 increase in outdoor PM 2.5 was associated with a 0.55 μ g m −3 [95% CI: 0.47, 0.63] increase indoors on non-wildfire smoke days and 0.51 μ g m −3 [95% CI: 0.44, 0.58] on wildfire-smoke days. Facility-specific regression coefficients of the effect of outdoor PM 2.5 on indoor PM 2.5 was variable between facilities on wildfire (0.18–0.79 μ g m −3 ) and non-wildfire days (0.11–1.03 μ g m −3 ). Indoor PM 2.5 responded almost immediately to increased outdoor PM 2.5 concentrations. Across facilities, 89% and 93% of the total PM 2.5 infiltration over 60 min occurred within the first 10 min following an increase in outdoor PM 2.5 on non-wildfire and wildfire days, respectively. We found that indoor PM 2.5 in childcare facilities increased with outdoor PM 2.5 . This effect varied between facilities and between wildfire-smoke and non-wildfire smoke days. These findings highlight the importance of air quality monitoring at childcare facilities for informed decision-making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".