Application of a modified clinical classification for pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease in children: emphasis on atrial septal defects and transposition of the great arteries. An analysis from the TOPP registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: A proportion of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD) do not fit in the current classification. We aimed to analyse the applicability of an adapted clinical classification of PAH-CHD to pediatric patients using the TOPP-1 registry (Tracking Outcomes and Practice in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension) and focus on atrial septal defects (ASD) and transposition of the great arteries (TGA). Methods and results: Hemodynamic and clinical data of all patients with PAH-CHD in the TOPP cohort were reviewed. Patients were classified according to predefined ABCDE categories (A: Eisenmenger syndrome, B: left-to-right shunt, C: coincidental defects, including all ASDs, D: corrected CHD, E: TGA), or as complex CHD (group 5), by 2 independent investigators. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer could either settle a final decision, or the patient was deemed not classifiable. Survival curves were calculated for each group and compared to idiopathic PAH patients of the registry. A total of 223 out of 531 patients in the registry had PAH-CHD, and 193 were categorized to the following groups: A 39(20%), B 27(14%), C 62(32%) including 43 ASDs, D 58(30%), E 7(4%), whereas 6 patients were categorized as group 5, and 10 patients were unable to be classified. No survival difference could be demonstrated between the groups. Conclusions: This modified classification seems to be more applicable to pediatric PAH-CHD patients than the previous classification, but some patients with PAH-CHD who never had a shunt remain unclassifiable. The role of ASD in pediatric PH should be reconsidered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".