Utilização de colostomia terminal em cão com neoplasia obstrutiva retal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colostomy is a surgical procedure in which the intestinal route is diverted to the abdomen through an intestinal stoma sutured to the skin. It is rarely reported in veterinary medicine due to postoperative complications such as suture dehiscence, infections, dermatitis, fecal incontinence, and mainly the tutor's difficulty in adapting to handling the bag. Surgical indication exists in cases of obstructive neoplasms in the colon and rectum, with the purpose of increasing the animal's quality of life by enabling the evasion of fecal content. The objective of this study is to report a surgical case of colostomy in a canine, Labrador, female and 13 years of age, as a possible procedure to treat signs of obstruction resulting from rectal neoplasm and to present the favorable and unfavorable factors of the procedure. The technique utilized was terminal colostomy with access to the abdominal cavity through the left flank. Despite tumor involvement, difficulty in management with the colostomy bag and the emergence of peristomal lesions, treatment resulted in increased patient survival and improvement of clinical signs of obstruction, and can thus be considered effective in cases of patients who need to divert the fecal route.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".