MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391519572 · doi:10.1121/10.0024618

Use of psychoacoustic spectrum warping, decision template fusion, and neighborhood component analysis in newborn cry diagnostic systems

2024· article· en· W4391519572 on OpenAlexafffund
Zahra Khalilzad, Chakib Tadj

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInfant Health and Development
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Feature selectionComponent (thermodynamics)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)PsychoacousticsArtificial intelligenceImage warpingSpeech recognitionSet (abstract data type)CryingFeature vectorMedicinePsychologyPerceptionLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dealing with newborns' health is a delicate matter since they cannot express needs, and crying does not reflect their condition. Although newborn cries have been studied for various purposes, there is no prior research on distinguishing a certain pathology from other pathologies so far. Here, an unsophisticated framework is proposed for the study of septic newborns amid a collective of other pathologies. The cry was analyzed with music inspired and speech processing inspired features. Furthermore, neighborhood component analysis (NCA) feature selection was employed with two goals: (i) Exploring how the elements of each feature set contributed to classification outcome; (ii) investigating to what extent the feature space could be compacted. The attained results showed success of both experiments introduced in this study, with 88.66% for the decision template fusion (DTF) technique and a consistent enhancement in comparison to all feature sets in terms of accuracy and 86.22% for the NCA feature selection method by drastically downsizing the feature space from 86 elements to only 6 elements. The achieved results showed great potential for identifying a certain pathology from other pathologies that may have similar effects on the cry patterns as well as proving the success of the proposed framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicInfant Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207