Recommendations for Transition to a Postsecondary Education Setting for Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shift into adulthood presents a set of challenges for those with type 1 diabetes (T1D), especially for those pursuing higher education [1]. Beyond the intricacies of academics and the adjustment to a new setting, young adults (YAs) with T1D must independently cope with the multiple demands of diabetes care [2,3]. In one mixed-methods study [4], T1D stakeholders (i.e. YAs with T1D, their parents/caregivers, and their health-care providers) generated and discussed several barriers to the effective transition of YAs to a postsecondary education setting in Canada, which has a universal health-care system, as well as positive strategies that may have buffered the risk of negative health outcomes during this period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.048 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.020 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".