Stable 2,5‐Dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone Based Organic Cathode Enabled by Coordination Polymer Formation and Binder Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Organic electrode materials are gaining increased attention in energy storage applications, but often encounter challenges such as low capacity and poor cycling stability. This paper explores the utilization of a 1‐D coordination polymer, copper(II)‐2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone (Cu‐DHBQ), as a cathode material for Li‐ion batteries for the first time. Cu‐DHBQ is air‐stable, devoid of coordinated water molecules, and possesses a high theoretical capacity of 266 mAh g −1 . With an optimal sodium alginate (SA) binder content of 25 wt%, the Cu‐DHBQ cathode demonstrates a notable initial capacity of 214 mAh g −1 and outstanding cycling stability, retaining 210 mAh g −1 (98% capacity retention) after 200 cycles at a current rate of 100 mA g −1 . A comprehensive investigation into the capacity fading mechanisms, the bonding capability of the SA binder, and the interactions between Cu‐DHBQ and SA is conducted using scanning electron microscope (SEM), peel tests, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), respectively. Additionally, the electrochemical reaction mechanisms of Cu‐DHBQ are examined using ex situ X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and FTIR. These findings offer valuable insights into understanding the electrochemical properties of coordination polymers and metal‐organic frameworks based on DHBQ, shedding light on their potential as materials for battery electrodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".