MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391540038 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad165e

The One-hundred-deg<sup>2</sup> DECam Imaging in Narrowbands (ODIN): Survey Design and Science Goals

2024· article· en· W4391540038 on OpenAlexaff
Kyoung-Soo Lee, Eric Gawiser, Changbom Park, Yujin Yang, F. Valdés, Dustin Lang, Vandana Ramakrishnan, Byeongha Moon, Nicole Firestone, Stephen Appleby, M. Celeste Artale, Moira Andrews, F. E. Bauer, Barbara Benda, Adam Broussard, Yi-Kuan Chiang, Robin Ciardullo, Arjun Dey, Rameen Farooq, C. Gronwall, L. Guaita, Yun Huang, Ho Seong Hwang, Sang Hyeok Im, Woong-Seob Jeong, Shreya Karthikeyan, Hwihyun Kim, S.-L. Kim, Ankit Kumar, Gautam Nagaraj, Julie Nantais, Nelson Padilla, Jaehong Park, Alexandra Pope, Roxana Popescu, David J. Schlegel, Eunsuk Seo, Akriti Singh, Hyunmi Song, P. Troncoso, A. K. Vivas, Ann I. Zabludoff, A. Zenteno

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryArgonne National LaboratoryIntegrated Electronics Engineering Center, Binghamton UniversityInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of PennsylvaniaFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftUniversity of SussexNational Research Foundation of KoreaUniversity of PortsmouthUniversidad Andrés BelloPurdue Research FoundationUniversity of ChicagoNational Research FoundationOhio State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNuclear Safety and Security CommissionMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoUniversity College LondonNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationPurdue UniversityScience and Technology Facilities CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyFermilabNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNarrowbandPhysicsRedshiftGalaxyAstrophysicsDark energySkyAstronomyHaloOpticsCosmology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We describe the survey design and science goals for One-hundred-deg 2 DECam Imaging in Narrowbands (ODIN), a NOIRLab survey using the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) to obtain deep (AB ∼ 25.7) narrowband images over an unprecedented area of sky. The three custom-built narrowband filters, N 419, N 501, and N 673, have central wavelengths of 419, 501, and 673 nm and respective FWHM of 7.5, 7.6, and 10.0 nm, corresponding to Ly α at z = 2.4, 3.1, and 4.5 and cosmic times of 2.8, 2.1, and 1.4 Gyr, respectively. When combined with even deeper, public broadband data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam, DECam, and in the future, the Legacy Survey of Space and Time, the ODIN narrowband images will enable the selection of over 100,000 Ly α -emitting (LAE) galaxies at these epochs. ODIN-selected LAEs will identify protoclusters as galaxy overdensities, and the deep narrowband images enable detection of highly extended Ly α blobs (LABs). Primary science goals include measuring the clustering strength and dark matter halo connection of LAEs, LABs, and protoclusters, and their respective relationship to filaments in the cosmic web. The three epochs allow for the redshift evolution of these properties to be determined during the period known as Cosmic Noon, where star formation was at its peak. The narrowband filter wavelengths are designed to enable interloper rejection and further scientific studies by revealing [O ii ] and [O iii ] at z = 0.34, Ly α and He ii 1640 at z = 3.1, and Lyman continuum plus Ly α at z = 4.5. Ancillary science includes similar studies of the lower-redshift emission-line galaxy samples and investigations of nearby star-forming galaxies resolved into numerous [O iii ] and [S ii ] emitting regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→