Impact of HeartWare ventricular assist device discontinuation on the pediatric population: An Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) registry analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) was discontinued in July 2021. The study aims to describe the impact the discontinuation the HVAD had on pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) utilization and outcomes. Methods: . Results were compared from before and after July 2021. All patients in the registry implanted with an HVAD were reported to determine overall outcomes of these patients and define who remains on the device. Results: The HeartMate 3 (HM3) primarily replaced the HVAD in pediatric patients increasing from 29 of 258 (11%) of implants before July 2021 to 31 of 109 (29%) of implants after. A small increase in the use of the Berlin Heart EXCOR (40 of 258, 16% before to 20 of 109, 18% after) and paracorporeal continuous flow devices (116 of 258, 45% before to 58 of 109, 53% after) was also observed. The rate of ischemic stroke increased in the overall population and a decrease in bleeding complications in the EXCOR group was observed. Of the 187 pediatric patients implanted with an HVAD in the registry, 7 patients remain supported, 1 patient transitioned from the HVAD to an HM3, and 6 patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusions: The HM3 has been the primary replacement for the HVAD in the medium-sized pediatric population. The rate of ischemic stroke was higher after July 2021.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".